Evaluate and tag the site:

It's our intention to reward web sites, which meet the following standards: WAI, HTML and CSS. So we ask you for a fair rating. If it's done careless we have to block your IP. Please rate a site only one times a day. In case you want check all articles, please use mentioned tools for validation.

No link to rate.

We appreciate your evaluation!

subject	how to	status quo	rate it
social tags:	no tag set		set your tags for this site
Content:	Please go to the site and decide, if the content is of any value for you. If you find an illegal content, please report it, in order we can delete the listing and do steps to be taken.		20 - excellent 15 10 - fair 5 1 - poor 0 - awful
Style, design:	Please rate the design. If the site contains a pop-up menu or window, which opens automatically or exit pages ..., please report it, in order we can delete the listing.		10 - excellent 8 5 - fair 3 1 - poor 0 - awful
Title:	The title tag of the site is: The webmaster of this website did not provide a title? see at W3C or rfc 2616 and rate it.		0
Description:	The description tag of the site contains: The webmaster of this website did not provide a description! The description of the page may appear as the site description in a listing. It should be concise and attractive to a user; Max = 1024; Suggested = 200; see also at W3C or rfc 2616 and rate it.		0
Keywords:	The keywords of the site are: Te webmaster of this website did not provide keywords. Relevant words, separated by commas, additional to those in body of text; Max = 1024; Suggested = 1000; see at W3C - Meta data or htmlhelp - META and vote.		0
Loading time:	The size of the site in kB is: Have a cup of coffee during a Java- or Flash-site is loading and try to find out the loading time. Useful is maybe "Fasterfox" a Firefox extention, Speed report or Loading time checker.		10 - excellent 8 5 - fair 3 1 - poor 0 - awful
Google PR	Click on "Check PageRank" to get the current Google PR.
valid HTML/XHTML	Please do not use any validators, but the W3C Markup Validation Service.
valid CSS	Please do not use any validators, but the W3C CSS Validation Service.
WAI compatible	Our recommendation: HiSoftware web-based site tester or Cynthia Says for WCAG 1.0 Priority 1,2,3 at Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. You may also use the form check your site now!
Back link	n/a		n/a
comment:	no comments yet on Google Group Adaxas		comment on google groups
adaxas votes:	Number of evaluations:
adaxas points:	Average rating and number of votes.
adaxas rank:	The more highly the points and number of votes the better the placement. Only the best 30 are displayed on adaxas Top 30.	: